Reflection: 1968, 1998, and 2025?

Please allow me to share with you a few ideas that keep churning in my head. History rarely moves in straight lines. Instead, it follows cycles—periods of upheaval, transformation, and recalibration. To understand the world today and the potential changes ahead, we can look back at two pivotal years: 1968 and 1998. Each marked a turning point, and as we stand at another crossroads, we must ask: Are we on the verge of another seismic shift? If so, what will define the new era? 1968: A World Divided by Ideology In 1968, the world was in turmoil. The Cold War had split nations into two opposing ideological blocks—a capitalist, democratic West and a communist, state-controlled East. Protests erupted across the globe: in the U.S., the civil rights and anti-war movements questioned authority; in France, workers and students took to the streets; in Czechoslovakia, reformers sought liberalization, only to be crushed by Soviet tanks. The old order struggled to contain these demands for freedom, rights, and self-determination. Yet, despite this division, the global structure was stable. Each side knew its place, and the threat of nuclear war ensured that neither pushed too far. Governments, for better or worse, exercised strong control over economies and societies. There was certainty in the structure, even as revolutions simmered beneath the surface. 1998: The Triumph of Globalization By 1998, the world looked vastly different. The Soviet Union had collapsed (1991), and democracy and free markets seemed to have won. Trade flourished, technology accelerated, and economic interdependence linked nations in ways that made war seem impractical. China, still under communist rule, had embraced market reforms, integrating into the global economy. The European Union expanded, offering a new model of cooperation. In the United States, prosperity soared as the internet revolutionized commerce and communication. Globalization created unprecedented economic growth, lifting millions out of poverty, but it also introduced new challenges: wealth disparities widened, industries shifted overseas, and financial markets became fragile. The world was no longer divided into two ideological camps, but new tensions emerged. Who would benefit from this prosperity? Would the democratic order hold, or would inequalities and cultural divides create new fault lines? Today: A Return to Division? Now, in the 2020s, the world seems to be shifting again. The certainty of the post-1998 era is unraveling. Some key developments: Rising geopolitical tensions: The U.S. and China are locked in strategic competition, reminiscent of the Cold War. Nations are forming economic and political alliances based on security rather than open markets. Erosion of democratic consensus: While democracy expanded after 1998, it is now facing challenges from within. Polarization, distrust in institutions, and the rise of authoritarian-leaning governments suggest a rethinking of political structures. Economic realignments: The once-unquestioned power of free markets is being challenged. Countries are reshoring industries, questioning trade dependencies, and emphasizing national resilience over pure economic efficiency. Technology as a new battlefield: In 1968, nuclear weapons defined power. In 1998, trade did. Today, technology—AI, data, and cyber capabilities—determines influence. Are we returning to a world divided into two ideological camps? Not necessarily in the same way as 1968, but we do see the rise of competing political and economic models. On one side, a coalition of liberal democracies continues to promote openness, while on the other, authoritarian-leaning states emphasize control, stability, and state-led economic growth. Looking Ahead: Are We at Another Turning Point? Just as 1968 and 1998 were moments of transition, today’s world is shifting toward something new. The open question is: What will this new era look like? Will democracy and free markets adapt, or will rising inequalities, social unrest, and geopolitical tensions force a new structure upon us? For students, the lesson is clear: history does not move in one direction. Every period of stability is eventually disrupted by forces that demand change. The choices made today—about governance, economic policy, technology, and international relations—will define the next 30 years just as 1968 and 1998 shaped the decades that followed them. If the world is indeed shifting, the key question is: Will this transition bring greater prosperity and fairness, or deeper divisions and conflict? The answer, as always, depends on the decisions YOU make now.